patent-pre-evaluation-report
Create and iteratively improve Chinese patent pre-application evaluation reports from a technical proposal, disclosure draft, invention idea, or prior report. Use when the user asks for 专利申请前预评估, 专利预评估报告, 查新点提炼, 可专利性分析, 非正常申请风险排查, 申请策略建议, or report updates driven by PatSnap/智慧芽 search evidence.
- 版本
- v1.0.0
- 下载量
- 0
- 文件列表
- 3
- 最近更新
- 2026-07-02
关于
Create and iteratively improve Chinese patent pre-application evaluation reports from a technical proposal, disclosure draft, invention idea, or prior report. Use when the user asks for 专利申请前预评估, 专利预评估报告, 查新点提炼, 可专利性分析, 非正常申请风险排查, 申请策略建议, or report updates driven by PatSnap/智慧芽 search evidence.
文件列表 3
SKILL.md
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| name | patent-pre-evaluation-report |
| description | Create and iteratively improve Chinese patent pre-application evaluation reports from a technical proposal, disclosure draft, invention idea, or prior report. Use when the user asks for 专利申请前预评估, 专利预评估报告, 查新点提炼, 可专利性分析, 非正常申请风险排查, 申请策略建议, or report updates driven by PatSnap/智慧芽 search evidence. |
Patent Pre-Application Evaluation Report
Overview
Use this skill to turn a technical proposal into a structured Chinese patent pre-application evaluation report, output as a complete HTML file whose CSS and layout exactly match the CUMT-IP-PRE-2026-0001.html reference template (deep-blue/gold color scheme, A4 portrait cover page, section-number circles, progress bars, conclusion quick-view page).
Treat the report as an iterative artifact: draft from the proposal, run real PatSnap/智慧芽 searches via the installed MCP tools, incorporate evidence, reassess risks, and update the conclusion.
Load references/report-workflow.md when drafting or revising a report.
Core Workflow
Step 1 — Clarify Input
If the user provides only a technology idea, extract: invention title, field, problem, solution, technical effects, application scenario, and likely inventors/applicant.
If the user provides a disclosure or prior report, preserve existing facts; mark uncertain or missing content as
待补充.If the user asks to iterate, identify the specific sections affected by new evidence.
Step 2 — Extract Technical Structure (MCP)
Call the following MCP tools from hub-mcp-gateway-novelty-search in order:
novelty_summary— extract tech problem / solution / efficacy (three elements)novelty_feature_extract— classify technical features and build the feature tableConvert strongest feature combinations into numbered 查新点 (3–6 points). Keep each 查新点 concrete: component, data, rule, parameter, workflow, model, or interaction logic — not broad effects.
Step 3 — Build Search Strategy (MCP)
Call in order:
novelty_keywords_extract— generate Chinese/English keyword groups + IPC classificationnovelty_keywords_extend— expand synonyms, hypernyms, hyponyms for each keywordnovelty_query_planner— plan multi-round Boolean retrieval queries
Output of this step populates the 检索范围与策略 chapter (databases, languages, date range, keyword table, IPC table, Boolean query strings).
Step 4 — Execute Real Search (MCP)
For each 查新点, call:
novelty_search_agent(preferred, full-pipeline AI search entry point) — OR split into:novelty_semantic_search(semantic similarity search)novelty_patent_search(keyword Boolean search)novelty_paper_search(academic paper search)
novelty_fetch_patent_data— fetch title, abstract, assignee, publication date, abstract figure for top hitsnovelty_abstract_figure_similarity— evaluate abstract figure similarity against the input solution (optional, when figures are available)
Record for every search: database, query string, date range, total hits, screened count, and selected references. Cite these in the report. Do not invent publication numbers, dates, applicants, or similarity scores.
Step 5 — Feature Comparison (MCP)
novelty_feature_comparison(ornovelty_feature_comparison_async+novelty_cc_resultfor large sets) — compare each close reference feature-by-feature against 查新点novelty_rl_predict— predict novelty / inventiveness score for top referencesnovelty_report_generate— generate the comparison narrative paragraph
Classify each feature as: 相同 / 相近 / 部分公开 / 未见 / 待复核.
Do not claim novelty from absence of evidence alone; phrase as "在当前检索样本中未见相同公开".
Step 6 — Evaluate & Iterate
Map each search result to one or more 查新点.
Classify relevance:
密切相关/相关/一般相关.When evidence weakens a 查新点, suggest narrowing, recombination, dependent-claim placement, or additional experimental support.
When evidence supports a strong conclusion, explain which distinguishing features carry novelty/inventiveness.
For market/industry context (转化价值评估 chapter), optionally call
novelty_website_search.
Step 7 — Generate HTML Report
After all MCP results are collected, generate a single self-contained HTML file with the following requirements:
Style requirements (must match reference template exactly):
CSS variables:
--primary: #1a3a6b,--primary-light: #2a5298,--accent: #c8a94b,--accent-light: #f5e6b8,--danger: #c0392b,--warning: #e67e22,--success: #27ae60,--info: #2980b9,--gray: #f4f6f9,--border: #d0d7e3Cover page: A4 portrait (
width: 210mm; max-width: 210mm; min-height: 297mm; margin: 0 auto),linear-gradient(145deg, #0d1f4a, #1a3a6b, #2a5298)deep-blue gradient background; see Cover Page Layout belowMain content area:
width: 210mm; max-width: 210mm; margin: 0 auto; padding: 24px 0 60px(no left/right padding so content width equals cover width)Section number circles:
#1a3a6bbackground, white textSection titles:
border-bottom: 2px solid #c8a94bgold underlineLeft-border highlights:
border-left: 4px solid #c8a94bTable headers:
#1a3a6bbackground, white textSimilarity progress bars: red (≥70%) / orange (40–69%) / green (<40%)
Conclusion quick-view page: deep-blue gradient background + gold-border cards
Fixed print button: bottom-right corner
Footer:
#1a3a6bbackground
Cover Page Layout (竖版A4封面,从上到下):
Top deep-blue bar (
height: 14mm,linear-gradient(90deg, #0d1f4a, #1a3a6b, #2a5298))Gold decorative line (
height: 4px, gradient gold)Institution header: left = "中国矿业大学" (17pt, bold, letter-spacing 3px) + English full name; right = circular gold-border "矿" badge
Divider line (blue-gold gradient)
Confidentiality badge (gold-border ellipse label: "内部保密 · 申请前预评估 · PatSnap 智慧芽支持")
Chinese main title (21pt, deep-blue bold, centered, two lines)
English subtitle (gray uppercase)
Report type box (deep-blue gradient background + gold text "专利 申 请 前 评 估 报 告")
Basic info table (2-col 8-row: report number, date, unit, field, inventors, IPC, confidentiality level, recommendation)
Red risk alert bar (red background, key risk conclusion + recommendation)
Confidentiality notice (light-gray dashed border, small text, usage restrictions)
Bottom deep-blue bar: left = institution name, right = report number + date (gold text)
Appendix card style (附件区块样式):
Section title uses same gold-underline style as other chapters
Each appendix item rendered as a rounded card:
border: 1px solid #d0d7e3,border-radius: 8px,background: #fff,padding: 20px,margin-bottom: 12pxLeft gold circle badge:
background: #c8a94b,color: #fff,font-weight: bold,border-radius: 50%,width: 32px,height: 32px, display inline-flex, align-centerAppendix title:
color: #1a3a6b,font-weight: bold,font-size: 1.05emDescription text:
color: #666,font-size: 0.9em,margin-top: 6px
Report chapters (in order):
封面 & 基本信息(竖版A4,见 Cover Page Layout)
数据安全与保密声明(固定模板,见下方说明,放在政策背景之前)
政策背景(固定模板文字,含职称改革政策,见下方说明)
技术方案要点(来自 Step 2 MCP 结果)
查新点与查新要求(来自 Step 2 MCP 结果)
检索范围与策略(来自 Step 3 MCP 结果)
检索结果与相关文献(来自 Step 4 MCP 真实检索结果)
逐项技术特征比对(来自 Step 5 MCP 比对结果)
可专利性风险判断(来自 Step 5 RL评分 + AI分析)
非正常申请风险排查(AI生成)
申请文件质量评估(AI生成)
转化价值评估(AI生成,可选调用 novelty_website_search)
申请策略建议(AI综合生成)
综合结论快览页(AI综合,含评分卡片)
数据安全与保密声明(固定内容,每份报告必须包含):
章节编号圆圈内仅显示 🔒 emoji,不含文字(避免溢出圆圈)
章节标题:数据安全与保密声明
使用与正文其他章节完全一致的
section/section-header/section-num/section-titleCSS class,不加内联样式覆盖4条声明内容(以表格/卡片形式展示):
内部使用与权限控制 :本报告仅供中国矿业大学科研院知识产权管理办公室、项目发明人及经授权代理机构使用,未经授权不得外传。
脱敏检索与最小披露 :外部检索仅使用关键词、IPC分类号和抽象技术特征,不上传技术交底书原文、核心参数完整表或未公开实验数据。
平台安全说明 :智慧芽(PatSnap)安全与合规能力可参见官方网站: https://www.zhihuiya.com/security-center。
留痕与复核 :提交、检索、修改、导出、盖章等环节应在知产办流程中留痕;AI辅助结论须经知识产权管理人员复核后使用。
政策背景(固定内容,每份报告必须包含,共5条政策):
教育部、科技部《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用 树立正确评价导向的若干意见》(教科技〔2020〕2号)
教育部《关于加强高校有组织科研 推动高水平自立自强的若干意见》(教科技〔2022〕1号)
国务院办公厅《专利转化运用专项行动方案(2023—2025年)》
人力资源和社会保障部、教育部《关于深化高等学校教师职称制度改革的指导意见》(人社部发〔2020〕100号) :明确将专利成果转化情况纳入职称评审,鼓励以专利转化实绩替代论文数量要求,推动"以用促创"。
教育部《破除"唯论文"不良导向若干措施》及配套政策 :支持将发明专利授权数量、许可转让收益、产学研合作纳入职称评定,以专利转化金额及经济效益作为职称晋升依据。
附件章节(必须生成,紧接第14章之后,缺失任何一个视为报告不完整):
附件1:检索式完整记录
内容:各查新点在智慧芽全球专利数据库中使用的完整检索式,含布尔逻辑运算符、字段限定和IPC分类号限定;以及CNKI/万方补充检索式(如未执行则标注"待填")
数据来源:Step 3
novelty_query_planner输出 + Step 4 实际执行的检索式
附件2:密切相关专利文献题录及摘要
内容:D1—DN所有密切相关专利的完整题录(申请号、公开号、申请人、发明人、IPC分类、公开日、摘要全文)
数据来源:Step 4
novelty_fetch_patent_data返回结果;期刊/学位论文未经CNKI/万方检索则标注"待补充"
附件3:相似专利清单(含智慧芽相似度)
内容:P1—PN所有相似专利列表,含公开号、申请人类型、IPC分类、智慧芽相似度得分、关联查新点编号
数据来源:Step 4
novelty_search_agent/novelty_semantic_search返回的相似度评分;不得手动填写评分
附件4:技术特征比对明细
内容:各查新点所有技术子特征(F1-1、F1-2…FN-M)与最接近对比文献的逐项对照,含相同点、差异点说明及比对结论
数据来源:Step 5
novelty_feature_comparison输出;与正文第八章保持一致
附件5:委托人提供资料清单
内容:发明人提交的技术交底书、实验数据、图纸、论文草稿等材料目录(用户未提供则标注"待补充")
数据来源:Step 1 用户输入整理
附件6:政策文件参考目录
内容:报告引用的政策文件列表,包括但不限于:教科技〔2020〕1号、国务院办公厅《专利转化运用专项行动方案(2023—2025年)》、国家知识产权局令第77号、人社部发〔2020〕100号、教育部破除唯论文配套政策、江苏省专利申请预审规范及教师职称评价相关文件
数据来源:固定政策模板 + 正文第三章政策背景引用
Output path: @session/reports/[报告编号].html
Use files.begin_write → repeated files.append → files.finish_write for large HTML files (never write the entire file in one payload).
Step 8 — Final Decision
Give one of: 建议申请 / 修改后申请 / 暂缓申请 / 不建议申请.
Include: application type, independent-claim focus, dependent-claim candidates, evidence gaps, and next actions.
Add review caveat: AI辅助结论及PatSnap检索结果,正式申请前须经知识产权专员或专利代理人复核。
Output Rules
Write primarily in Chinese unless the user asks otherwise.
Professional report tone, not marketing copy.
Use tables for: search strategy, close references, feature comparison, patentability risk, abnormal application risk.
Preserve provenance: cite search date, database, query, result count, screened count, and evidence source for every search conclusion.
Mark uncertain bibliographic data as
待复核; never invent publication numbers, applicants, dates, or similarity scores.Keep confidentiality language visible when the report is based on unpublished technology.
Final output must always be a complete HTML file saved to
@session/reports/, not a Markdown block in chat.附件1—附件6必须全部生成 ,每个附件用独立卡片渲染,缺失任何一个附件视为报告不完整。
数据安全与保密声明必须生成 ,位于政策背景章节之前。
section-num 圆圈内仅放数字或单个emoji ,不放文字,避免溢出。
References
references/report-workflow.md: report section skeleton, MCP tool call sequence, PatSnap evidence schema, risk scoring guidance, HTML style guide, and iteration checklist.
使用前配置
本 Skill 依赖智慧芽开放平台 MCP 服务:
完成安装、初次使用时需进行自检,参见 README.md
用户需完成账号授权,并确保 Agent 环境已启用对应 MCP 工具
若未完成配置,本 Skill 只能提供分析框架,无法检索实时数据或生成基于数据库的结论
缺少MCP配置时,引导用户参照 README.md 在 [ open.zhihuiya.com ]( https://open.zhihuiya.com/ ) 获取MCP。